Search Site

Trends banner

Ozempic maker lowers outlook

The company posted tepid Q3 results.

Kimberly-Clark to buy Kenvue

The deal is valued at $48.7 billion.

BYD Q3 profit down 33%

This was a 33% year-on-year decrease.

Alphabet posts first $100 bn quarter

The growth was powered by cloud division buoyed by AI

Nvidia to take stake in Nokia

Nvidia share price soars 20%.

Jailed Istanbul mayor in court over ‘falsified degree’

Ozgur Ozel, Leader of Republican People's Party (CHP), gestures as he gives a speech during a rally in support of the jailed Mayor of Istanbul, Ekrem Imamogluin, in the Kadikoy district of Istanbul, on September 10, 2025. Photo by Ozan KOSE / AFP)
  • The mayor is a popular figure, regarded as the only politician capable of beating President Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the ballot box
  • He was detained on March 19 and jailed several days later as part of a corruption investigation, a move that sparked Turkey's worst street protests in over a decade

Istanbul, TurkeyIstanbul’s jailed opposition mayor Ekrem Imamoglu went on trial Friday on charges of falsifying his university degree.

The mayor is a popular figure, regarded as the only politician capable of beating President Recep Tayyip Erdogan at the ballot box.He was detained on March 19 and jailed several days later as part of a corruption investigation, a move that sparked Turkey’s worst street protests in over a decade.On the eve of his arrest, Istanbul University revoked his degree alleging it had been falsely obtained. Under the Turkish constitution, anyone who runs for president must have a higher education degree.

Imamoglu, the main opposition CHP’s candidate for the 2028 presidential race, denounced the move as “unlawful” and vowed to fight it in court.

Friday’s hearing took place at Silivri courthouse, which is attached to the prison where he is being held 80 kilometres (50 miles) west of Istanbul.

Imamoglu is accused of “repeated falsification of official documents” in connection with alleged irregularities with his degree, according to legal documents.

As he walked into the courtroom just before midday (0900 GMT), many spectators began applauding and whistling, some chanting “President Imamoglu”, according to footage posted online by a Sozcu TV reporter.

Imamoglu’s lawyer Mehmet Pehlivan — who was also jailed in June — connected to the hearing online but refused to offer a defence because he had not been allowed to talk with his client.

He asked to be physically present at the next hearing, and the judge said he would consider the request, news media reported.

‘What exactly is my crime?’

Addressing the court, Imamoglu said he had been accepted to a university in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) — a territory only recognised by Ankara — when he was 18.

He studied for a degree, which he then transferred to Istanbul University to complete in line with Turkey’s Council of Higher Education (YOK) regulations, he added.

“I saw the announcement for a horizontal transfer to Istanbul University, met the requirements, applied and was accepted, studied and graduated,” he said.

“What exactly is my crime here? What fraud?” he asked, his remarks posted on X by lawyers and journalists at the court.

“This is the level of absurdity in the indictment: next they might even claim the TRNC does not exist just so my degree can be revoked.”

Prosecutors are seeking a jail term of up to eight years and nine months and a ban on all political activity.

Imamoglu’s office has already published a copy of the business management degree he received from Istanbul University in 1995 after a journalist questioned whether he had one.

The mayor has faced a mounting array of legal cases which critics say are politically motivated.

In June, he went on trial over remarks questioning the integrity of Istanbul’s chief public prosecutor, facing charges of “threatening” and “insulting a public official”.

He is also on trial for remarks he made about a court-appointed expert witness testifying against several CHP-run town councils, accused in this case of having attempted to influence a fair trial.