Search Site

Trends banner

ADNOC Drilling H1 revenue $2.37bn

The company posted a net profit of $692m.

Eni profit falls due to dip in oil prices

Q2 net profit fell by 18% to $637 million.

Emirates NBD H1 profit $3.40bn

Total income rose by 12 percent in the same period.

ADIB H1 pre-tax profit $1.08bn

Q2 pre-tax net profit increases by 14 percent.

AstraZeneca to invest $50bn in US

Bulk of funds to go into a Virginia manufacturing center.

German anti-cartel watchdog puts Apple under surveillance

The Mac's 40th birthday comes when the global PC market has sagged with the rise of smartphone lifestyles. (AFP)
  • The Federal Cartel Office said it had determined Apple to be a company of "paramount significance for competition across markets'.
  • Apple joins Amazon, Google parent Alphabet and Meta, the group behind Facebook, in falling under reinforced monitoring.

Berlin, Germany – Germany’s anti-cartel watchdog said Wednesday it had placed US computing giant Apple under closer surveillance for any possible abuse of its market position.

The Federal Cartel Office said it had determined Apple to be a company of “paramount significance for competition across markets”, a move that would allow it to “take action against and effectively prohibit anti-competitive practices”.

Apple joins Amazon, Google parent Alphabet and Meta, the group behind Facebook, in falling under reinforced monitoring made possible by the German Competition Act.

The act, which came into force in January 2021, allows the cartel authority to intervene earlier, particularly against the world’s tech giants.

Products like the hugely successful iPhone meant Apple presided over a “wide-ranging digital ecosystem which is of great importance to competition” in Germany and worldwide, Federal Cartel Office chief Andreas Mundt said in a statement.

The group controlled the “access to the ecosystem and Apple customers” through software products such as the iOS operating system and its app store, Mundt said.

This “outstanding position” was backed by the US group’s significant financial resources, broad user base and the strength of the Apple brand, the competition authority said.

Apple also had “privileged access to data relevant for competition” via its network of products, the agency said.

All in all, the group had a “position of power” that created the potential to act in ways “not sufficiently controlled by competition”.

In practice, the Federal Cartel Office was also looking to see whether app tracking rules “could favor Apple’s own offers” but said that “no decision has been taken on initiating further proceedings”.

The agency said last week it was examining if it needed to place Apple’s rival Microsoft under increased surveillance for anti-competitive practices.