“We are very serious about safeguard issues, and do not want to allow some of the IAEA’s baseless accusations to remain,” Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian said, state news agency IRNA reported.
The issue has poisoned relations between the IAEA and the Islamic republic, which considers the matter “political in nature, and which should not be used as a pretext to punish Iran”, an Iranian diplomat said, quoted by IRNA.
The comments come a day after the United States responded to Iran’s proposals on reviving the landmark agreement trashed by former president Donald Trump.
“We are in the process of examining the response of the Americans,” Amir-Abdollahian said.
Just weeks after the deal looked dead, the European Union put forward on August 8 what it called a final text to restore the agreement, in which Iran would see sanctions relief and be able to sell its oil again in return for severe limits on its nuclear program.
Iran came back last week with a series of proposed changes, to which the United States formally responded on Wednesday, a day after Tehran accused its arch-enemy of stonewalling.
The 2015 agreement between Iran and six world powers Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States gave the Islamic republic sanctions relief in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program.
The deal formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, was designed to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon something it has always denied wanting to do.
Earlier this week, a senior US official said that Iran had lifted its block on certain IAEA inspections.
Asked about the foreign minister’s remarks, State Department spokesman Vedant Patel said Thursday that the United States has insisted to Iran “in public and in private” that it answer the IAEA.
“We’ve also been clear that we do not believe there should be any conditionality between reimplementation of the JCPOA and the investigations related to Iran’s legal obligations,” Patel told reporters.