This is a temporary backup site for TRENDS MENA while our primary website is being restored following a regional disruption affecting Amazon Web Services cloud infrastructure in the GCC.

Search Site

ADNOC Distribution 2025 dividend $700m

The company had reported EBITDA of $1.17 bn in 2025.

Empower okays $119.1m H2 2025 dividend

The dividend is equivalent to 43.75% of paid-up capital.

Alujain widens 2025 loss

The increase in loss is due to impairment charges, weaker prices.

Masar 2025 net profit $262m

Higher land plot sales boost revenue and operating income.

Tasnee’s 2025 losses deepen

The petrochemicals' company's revenue also fell 17.7 percent.

US condemns WTO verdict on its steel tariffs

  • Former US president Donald Trump's administration introduced the tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from China, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey
  • The WTO's Dispute Settlement Body found the measures imposed by the United States were inconsistent with various articles of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)

Geneva, Switzerland— Washington condemned the World Trade Organization’s verdict Friday on the punitive US tariffs imposed on national security grounds on steel imports from China and other countries.

Former US president Donald Trump’s administration introduced the tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from China, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey and his successor, Joe Biden, has stuck with them.

“The United States strongly rejects the flawed interpretation and conclusions in the WTO Panel reports released today…,” Adam Hodge, spokesman for the US Trade Representative Katherine Tai, said in a statement.

Also read: WTO to lift Covid vaccine patents, but many doubt it will work

“The United States has held the clear and unequivocal position, for over 70 years, that issues of national security cannot be reviewed in WTO dispute settlement.”

The Geneva-based WTO had no authority to second-guess a WTO member’s ability to respond to security threats, he added.

Also read: WTO urges countries to lift green trade barriers

The WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body found the measures imposed by the United States were inconsistent with various articles of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).

The panel also determined that these inconsistencies were not justified by the security exceptions provided for in the GATT, as they were not applied in a time of war or during a case of serious international tension.

“The Panel recommends that the United States bring its WTO-inconsistent measures into conformity with its obligations under the GATT 1994,” it said.