Search Site

BP announces $7bn gas project

The project aims to unlock 3 trillion cu ft of gas resources in Indonesia.

Lulu Retail Q3 profit $35m

For the nine-month period, net profit increased by 73.3%.

Talabat IPO offer price range announced

The subscription will close on 27 Nov for UAE retail investors.

Salik 9M net profit $223m

The company's third-quarter profit increased by 8.8 percent.

Avia to buy 40 Boeing aircraft

The transaction for the purchase of 737 MAX 8 jets valued at $4.9bn.

Ecuador revokes Wikileaks founder’s citizenship

    • Ecuadorian authorities say his naturalisation letter had multiple inconsistencies
    • Assange is currently in a British prison since he was arrested in April 2019 for skipping bail seven years earlier

    Ecuador has revoked the citizenship of Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks saying his  naturalisation letter had multiple inconsistencies, different signatures, the possible alteration of documents and unpaid fees, among other issues.

    Assange is currently in a British prison since he was arrested in April 2019 for skipping bail seven years earlier during a separate legal battle.

    The Australian activist was formally notified about  the nullity of his naturalisation in a letter that came in response to a claim filed by the South American country’s Foreign Ministry.

    Carlos Poveda, Assange’s lawyer, told The Associated Press the decision was made without due process and Assange was not allowed to appear in the case.

    “On the date (Assange) was cited he was deprived of his liberty and with a health crisis inside the deprivation of liberty center where he was being held,” Poveda said, quoted by the AP adding he will file appeals asking for  clarification of the decision.

    “More than the importance of nationality, it is a matter of respecting rights and following due process in withdrawing nationality,” he added.

    Assange received Ecuadorian citizenship in January 2018.  

    Ecuador’s Foreign Ministry told AP the court had “acted independently and followed due process in a case that took place during the previous government and that was raised by the same previous government.”